<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="1"?>
<pra datepubli="2018-07-25" lastupdate="2018-07-27">
 <uuid>74046225-3d5f-4d2f-9981-189fba1d188e</uuid>
 <country>EU</country>
 <datepra>2012-03-12</datepra>
 <title>Statement on the identity of apple snails</title>
 <description><![CDATA[<p>Following a request by the European Commission, EFSA&rsquo;s Panel on Plant Health was asked to deliver a statement to clarify the current scientific knowledge regarding the identity of the apple snails in the context of the evaluation of the pest risk analysis prepared by the Spanish Ministry of Environment and Rural and Marine Affairs (EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), 2012). The Panel concludes on the risk to plant health posed by&nbsp;<em>Pomacea&nbsp;</em>species in the &lsquo;<em>canaliculata</em> complex&rsquo;, that out of the around 50 species in the genus of&nbsp;<em>Pomacea</em>, four species&nbsp;<em>P. canaliculata</em>,&nbsp;<em>P. insularum</em>,&nbsp;<em>P. lineata</em> and&nbsp;<em>P. maculata</em>belong to the &lsquo;<em>canaliculata</em> complex&rsquo;, where&nbsp;<em>P. insularum</em> and&nbsp;<em>P. maculata</em> are recently considered to be synonyms. Current methods of identification imply high uncertainty if risk reduction options are applied at the&nbsp;<em>Pomacea&nbsp;</em>single species level. The Spanish pest risk analysis identifies important plant health risks connected to&nbsp;<em>Pomacea&nbsp;</em>species. The available scientific evidence indicates that other&nbsp;<em>Pomacea&nbsp;</em>species may pose similar risks to plant health as identified for&nbsp;<em>P. insularum</em>.<br>The Panel clarifies that risk reduction options should not be targeted to single species of the genus&nbsp;<em>Pomacea&nbsp;</em>considering: (i) the dynamical situation in the current study on the systematics of the Ampullariidae species and the genus&nbsp;<em>Pomacea&nbsp;</em>in particular; (ii) the uncertainties and the possible unexpected evolution of the invasive potential of species of&nbsp;<em>Pomacea&nbsp;</em>other than&nbsp;<em>P. insularum&nbsp;</em>and P.&nbsp;<em>canaliculata</em>; (iii) the poor knowledge on the trophic habits of many species of the genus&nbsp;<em>Pomacea</em>, with possible overlaps in the trophic niche (macrophytes); (iv) the high uncertainty on the identification of the different&nbsp;<em>Pomacea&nbsp;</em>species.</p>]]></description>
 <author id="16">
  <fullname>EPPO Secretariat (EPPO entered these PRAs in the platform but please contact EFSA if you have questions)</fullname>
  <institute id="8">European Food Safety Authority</institute>
 </author>
 <organisms>
  <organism eppocode="1POMAG">Pomacea</organism>
  <organism eppocode="POMACA">Pomacea canaliculata</organism>
  <organism eppocode="POMALI">Pomacea lineata</organism>
  <organism eppocode="POMAIN">Pomacea maculata</organism>
 </organisms>
 <praarea>
  <area isocode="9L">EU</area>
 </praarea>
 <files>
  <file type="1" size="0">
   <title>link</title>
   <url>https://pra.eppo.int/getfile/0262d36e-64e9-43cd-8d75-eec79d7113ca</url>
  </file>
 </files>
</pra>
