<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="1"?>
<pra datepubli="2018-10-02" lastupdate="2024-05-13">
 <uuid>828377f9-8232-4d35-a110-5e33c251a01e</uuid>
 <country>EU</country>
 <datepra>2017-11-21</datepra>
 <title>Evaluation of a paper by Guarnaccia et al. (2017) on the first report of Phyllosticta citricarpa in Europe</title>
 <description><![CDATA[<p>The Plant Health Panel&nbsp;reviewed the paper by Guarnaccia et&nbsp;al. (<a data-tab="pane-pcw-references" href="https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5114#efs25114-bib-0027">2017</a>) and compared their findings with previous predictions on the establishment of P<em>hyllosticta citricarpa</em>. Four species of <em>Phyllosticta&nbsp;</em>were found by Guarnaccia et&nbsp;al. (<a data-tab="pane-pcw-references" href="https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5114#efs25114-bib-0027">2017</a>) in Europe. <em>P.&nbsp;citricarpa</em> and <em>P.&nbsp;capitalensis</em> are well‐defined species, with <em>P.&nbsp;citricarpa</em> recorded for the first time in Europe, confirming predictions by Magarey et al. (<a data-tab="pane-pcw-references" href="https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5114#efs25114-bib-0039">2015</a>) and EFSA (2008, 2014, 2016) that <em>P.&nbsp;citricarpa</em> can establish in some European citrus‐growing regions. Two new species <em>P.&nbsp;paracitricarpa</em> and <em>P. paracapitalensis</em> were also described, with <em>P.&nbsp;paracitricarpa</em> (found only in Greece) shown to be pathogenic on sweet orange fruits. Genotyping of the <em>P.&nbsp;citricarpa</em> isolates suggests at least two independent introductions, with the population in Portugal being different from that present in Malta and Italy. <em>P.&nbsp;citricarpa</em> and <em>P.&nbsp;paracitricarpa</em> were isolated only from leaf litter in backyards. However, since <em>P.&nbsp;citricarpa</em> does not infect or colonise dead leaves, the pathogen must have infected the above living leaves in citrus trees nearby. Guarnaccia et al. (<a data-tab="pane-pcw-references" href="https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5114#efs25114-bib-0027">2017</a>) considered introduction to be a consequence of <em>P.&nbsp;citricarpa</em> having long been present or of illegal movement of planting material. In the Panel&#39;s view, the fruit pathway would be an equally or more likely origin. The authors did not report how surveys for citrus black spot (CBS) disease were carried out, therefore their claim that there was no CBS disease even where the pathogen was present is not supported by the results presented. From previous simulations, the locations where Guarnaccia et al. (<a data-tab="pane-pcw-references" href="https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5114#efs25114-bib-0027">2017</a>) found <em>P.&nbsp;citricarpa</em> or <em>P.&nbsp;paracitricarpa</em> were conducive or <em>P. citricarpa&nbsp;</em>establishment, with number of simulated infection events by pycnidiospores comparable to sites of CBS occurrence outside Europe. Preliminary surveys by National Plant Protection Organisations (NPPOs) have not confirmed so far the findings by Guarnaccia et&nbsp;al. (<a data-tab="pane-pcw-references" href="https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5114#efs25114-bib-0027">2017</a>) but monitoring is still ongoing.</p>]]></description>
 <author id="16">
  <fullname>EPPO Secretariat (EPPO entered these PRAs in the platform but please contact EFSA if you have questions)</fullname>
  <institute id="8">European Food Safety Authority</institute>
 </author>
 <organisms>
  <organism eppocode="GUIGCI">Phyllosticta citricarpa</organism>
 </organisms>
 <praarea>
  <area isocode="9L">EU</area>
 </praarea>
 <files>
  <file type="3" size="0">
   <title>link</title>
   <url>https://pra.eppo.int/getfile/5031d691-9988-4059-af1b-7d3da63593c7</url>
  </file>
 </files>
</pra>
