<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="1"?>
<pra datepubli="2018-07-25" lastupdate="2020-05-26">
 <uuid>8e2d2109-bfd0-48b4-8ef6-c904909cbdc6</uuid>
 <country>EU</country>
 <datepra>2013-03-20</datepra>
 <title>Scientific Opinion on comments provided by Portugal on the phytosanitary risk associated with Pinus pinea for the spread of pine wood nematode</title>
 <description><![CDATA[<p>Following a request from European Commission, the PLH Panel examined the comments of the Portuguese plant health authorities on a previous EFSA opinion with regard to pine wood nematode (PWN) and&nbsp;<em>Pinus pinea</em> and a report on PWN surveys in Portugal. Regarding the comment, based on behavioural responses of PWN to CO2 and to &szlig;-myrcene, that&nbsp;<em>Monochamus galloprovincialis</em> can feed on&nbsp;<em>P.</em><em>pinea</em> without implying PWN infestation, the Panel noted the uncertainties on how chemical attraction influences the exit of PWN from the vector. The Panel agreed that&nbsp;<em>P. pinea</em> is not a preferred breeding host of&nbsp;<em>M. galloprovincialis</em>, but it noted the evidence from Italy of breeding of&nbsp;<em>M. galloprovincialis</em> in fallen woods of&nbsp;<em>P. pinea</em>, suggesting&nbsp;<em>P. pinea</em> to be an occasional host. The Panel agreed that, although pathogenicity of PWN has been recorded on&nbsp;<em>P. pinea</em> in inoculation experiments on small plants, this does not necessarily relate to pathogenicity on larger trees in the field. The additional information on Portuguese PWN surveys is not sufficient to conclude that&nbsp;<em>P. pinea</em> is resistant to PWN. The Panel also noted that asymptomatic infestations by PWN are well known in other areas, and pine species considered tolerant to PWN could still maintain it at low levels in restricted parts of a tree. The Panel concluded that there is high uncertainty concerning the classification of the risk of spread of PWN with plants and wood of&nbsp;<em>P. pinea</em>, owing to the scarcity of information on the interaction of&nbsp;<em>M. galloprovincialis,</em> PWN and&nbsp;<em>P. pinea</em>, as well as on the field resistance of&nbsp;<em>P. pinea</em> to PWN. Owing to high uncertainty related to the host potential of&nbsp;<em>P. pinea</em>, more studies on the transmission of PWN at feeding wounds and on its survival in trees and wood of&nbsp;<em>P. pinea</em> are needed. </p>]]></description>
 <author id="16">
  <fullname>EPPO Secretariat (EPPO entered these PRAs in the platform but please contact EFSA if you have questions)</fullname>
  <institute id="8">European Food Safety Authority</institute>
 </author>
 <tags>
  <tag>host range</tag>
 </tags>
 <organisms>
  <organism eppocode="BURSXY">Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</organism>
  <organism eppocode="MONCGA">Monochamus galloprovincialis</organism>
 </organisms>
 <hosts>
  <host eppocode="PIUPN">Pinus pinea</host>
 </hosts>
 <praarea>
  <area isocode="9L">EU</area>
 </praarea>
 <files>
  <file type="1" size="0">
   <title>link</title>
   <url>https://pra.eppo.int/getfile/bae13fd2-d8c1-4b7e-bc83-be716acf1a57</url>
  </file>
 </files>
</pra>
