<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="1"?>
<pra datepubli="2019-05-17" lastupdate="2020-04-21">
 <uuid>e9a435d4-1922-47c4-a003-cc31fd479c28</uuid>
 <country>EU</country>
 <datepra>2019-03-28</datepra>
 <title>Commodity risk assessment of black pine (Pinus thunbergii Parl.) bonsai from Japan</title>
 <description><![CDATA[<p>The EFSA Panel on Plant health was requested to deliver a scientific opinion on how far the existing requirements for the bonsai pine species subject to derogation in Commission Decision 2002/887/EC would cover all plant health risks from black pine (<em>Pinus thunbergii</em> Parl.) bonsai (the commodity defined in the EU legislation as naturally or artificially dwarfed plants) imported from Japan, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Japan. The relevance of an EU‐regulated pest for this opinion was based on: (a) evidence of the presence of the pest in Japan; (b) evidence that&nbsp;<em>P.&nbsp;thunbergii</em> is a host of the pest and (c) evidence that the pest can be associated with the commodity. Sixteen pests that fulfilled all three criteria were selected for further evaluation. The relevance of other pests present in Japan (not regulated in the EU) for this opinion was based on (i) evidence of the absence of the pest in the EU; (ii) evidence that&nbsp;<em>P.&nbsp;thunbergii</em> is a host of the pest; (iii) evidence that the pest can be associated with the commodity and (iv) evidence that the pest may have an impact in the EU. Three pests fulfilled all four criteria and were selected for further evaluation (<em>Crisicoccus pini, Sirex nitobei</em> and&nbsp;<em>Urocerus japonicus</em>). For the selected 19 pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier were evaluated. Limiting factors on the effectiveness of the measures were documented. For each of the 19 pests, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including any uncertainties. For all evaluated pests, the median likelihood of the pest freedom is 99.5% or higher and within the 90% uncertainty range it is 99% or higher. </p>]]></description>
 <author id="49">
  <fullname>Virag  Kertesz (EFSA)</fullname>
  <institute id="8">European Food Safety Authority</institute>
 </author>
 <tags>
  <tag>bonsai</tag>
  <tag>commodity PRA</tag>
  <tag>pest list</tag>
 </tags>
 <organisms>
  <organism eppocode="BURSXY">Bursaphelenchus xylophilus</organism>
  <organism eppocode="COLSAS">Coleosporium asterum</organism>
  <organism eppocode="COLSPH">Coleosporium phellodendri</organism>
  <organism eppocode="DACLPI">Crisicoccus pini</organism>
  <organism eppocode="1CRONG">Cronartium</organism>
  <organism eppocode="DENDSI">Dendrolimus sibiricus</organism>
  <organism eppocode="DENDSC">Dendrolimus spectabilis</organism>
  <organism eppocode="SCIRPI">Dothistroma septosporum</organism>
  <organism eppocode="GIBBCI">Fusarium circinatum</organism>
  <organism eppocode="SCIRAC">Lecanosticta acicola</organism>
  <organism eppocode="MONCAL">Monochamus alternatus</organism>
  <organism eppocode="PIUTH">Pinus thunbergii</organism>
  <organism eppocode="PISONI">Pissodes nitidus</organism>
  <organism eppocode="PISOOB">Pissodes obscurus</organism>
  <organism eppocode="POPIJA">Popillia japonica</organism>
  <organism eppocode="CERSPD">Pseudocercospora pini-densiflorae</organism>
  <organism eppocode="SIRXNI">Sirex nitobei</organism>
  <organism eppocode="THEOJA">Thecodiplosis japonensis</organism>
  <organism eppocode="URCEJA">Urocerus japonicus</organism>
  <organism eppocode="XIPHAM">Xiphinema americanum sensu lato</organism>
 </organisms>
 <hosts>
  <host eppocode="PIUTH">Pinus thunbergii</host>
 </hosts>
 <praarea>
  <area isocode="9L">EU</area>
 </praarea>
 <files>
  <file type="1" size="0">
   <title>link</title>
   <url>https://pra.eppo.int/getfile/76436203-beb1-44e4-b33c-c36cb45943e0</url>
  </file>
 </files>
</pra>
